But could I also impose upon us that we are treating our anthropogenic poisoning of the planet via emissions not just from cars, industry but from transportation of 'consumables' these 'things' that generate 130,000 airplanes in the air any given day, but also ship tracks of equivalent numbers (and that's about half of actual ships as not that many private boats have the recording AIS program on board! Then we do intentional weather modification - which is treating the poisons with more poisons - eventually these all land in our air we breathe, the water we drink and the soils we grow our foods in... So what do you feel is the best outcome here? Do some Math, I did, it doesn't add up to sustainable humanity. Here is my substack on "MOTH MATH"
What totally compounds the buy into the carbon climate crisis that feeds the carbon tax and all the SDG BS is the very fact people are not interested in turning a page of research it's like any market - an emotional reaction rather than a decision founded in considered facts.
We seem to like paying and paying more and feeding the hyper-inflation cycle... I say this because - not only are we being asked to help support this private group action as a whole township or district, (quite a de facto maneuver) we also will pay for the other side of the legal battle at the pump... my gawd folks, who has the dime to do this and not open some research is simple nonsensical. I'm not sure with the loss of freedom of speech however, I'm actually allowed to express my opinion anymore... certainly my direct neighborhood is filling up with those EV Cars and Bikes - YIKES!
I have also a big beef with Forestry Herbicide practices - as per this article by GeoEngineering Free Canada. "Geoengineering - the cause of wildfires?"https://open.substack.com/pub/geoengineeringfreecanada/p/geoengineering-the-cause-of-wildfires?r=1b895l&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
But could I also impose upon us that we are treating our anthropogenic poisoning of the planet via emissions not just from cars, industry but from transportation of 'consumables' these 'things' that generate 130,000 airplanes in the air any given day, but also ship tracks of equivalent numbers (and that's about half of actual ships as not that many private boats have the recording AIS program on board! Then we do intentional weather modification - which is treating the poisons with more poisons - eventually these all land in our air we breathe, the water we drink and the soils we grow our foods in... So what do you feel is the best outcome here? Do some Math, I did, it doesn't add up to sustainable humanity. Here is my substack on "MOTH MATH"
https://open.substack.com/pub/cheriseagirl/p/the-moth-math?r=1b895l&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I'm ashamed to say our little town of Gibsons joined the action of SBO in 2023 https://www.coastreporter.net/opinion/letters-gibsons-first-municipality-to-join-sue-big-oil-6748024 - then Sechelt was heading that way and was planning on sharing the legal costs with its constituents without a referendum of sorts, and well... it was vetoed! https://www.coastreporter.net/opinion/letters-sechelt-stay-out-of-politics-out-of-sue-big-oil-9177384
What totally compounds the buy into the carbon climate crisis that feeds the carbon tax and all the SDG BS is the very fact people are not interested in turning a page of research it's like any market - an emotional reaction rather than a decision founded in considered facts.
We seem to like paying and paying more and feeding the hyper-inflation cycle... I say this because - not only are we being asked to help support this private group action as a whole township or district, (quite a de facto maneuver) we also will pay for the other side of the legal battle at the pump... my gawd folks, who has the dime to do this and not open some research is simple nonsensical. I'm not sure with the loss of freedom of speech however, I'm actually allowed to express my opinion anymore... certainly my direct neighborhood is filling up with those EV Cars and Bikes - YIKES!